Forum

  • If you are new to these Forums, please take a moment to register using the fields above.
Announcement Announcement Module
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wanted: unbiased opinions and Wikipedia editors Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse
X
Conversation Detail Module
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wanted: unbiased opinions and Wikipedia editors

    Hi all,

    There is some disagreement over on this Wikipedia discussion page:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ge...related_to_GTD

    It discusses the main Wikipedia GTD page pointing to this page - a list of GTD software but heavily populated with adverts for their non-gtd coaching and methodology:
    http://www.priacta.com/Articles/Comp...D_Software.php

    ...Which links to this page explaining why their methodology is better than GTD.
    http://www.priacta.com/Training/Trai...Q.shtml#TROGTD

    So if you have an opinion (either way) about this, I'd encourage you to weigh in. I have a potential bias as I develop GTD software but I feel the issue is greater than that. Surely a page that is linked to from the Wikipedia, about GTD, should point to someone (anyone!) who isn't promoting their own alternative methodology?
    Last edited by richard.watson; 02-06-2008, 03:12 AM. Reason: more explanation
Working...
X